I will call your attention this morning while I read to you that
scripture recorded in the Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the
Galatians, 1st. chap.
[President Grant read the whole chapter.]
Not long ago, our President was saying that he would like it, if the
Elders would preach the Gospel. Considering myself an Elder, and years
ago having had some experience in preaching the first principles of
the Gospel to the world, I thought this morning I would endeavor, by
the aid of your prayers, and by the aid of the Spirit of the Lord, to
preach what I consider the Gospel.
In the chapter I have read there is a favorite text, that I used to
select when I was traveling abroad to preach, particularly when I
chanced to get among those who supposed the Latter-day Saints, or
"Mormons," had a new Bible, and preached a new Gospel. I used to
select the eighth verse of the chapter I have just read, which reads
as follows—"But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other
gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be
accursed."
All who understand the language of this passage, will agree that the
Apostle alluded particularly to the Gospel that he had preached to the
Galatians and others, and that which was preached by his colleagues,
the other Apostles, and by others who were authorized to preach.
It would be useless for a man to embrace our religion unless he could
be satisfied that the first principles thereof are based upon the word
of God contained in the holy Scriptures. In relation to our faith, I
would say, the Gospel as preached by the Apostles, and as contained in
the book of Mormon, is the same, or agrees with the Gospel contained
in the Bible. The Gospel preached by Joseph Smith, and the
revelations of God that have come through him to the Church, as
contained in the Book of Doctrine and Covenants, fully agree with the
Gospel contained in the New Testament.
The commission given to Joseph Smith and others in our day, was to go
forth and preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and the Lord said unto
them, "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; and he that
believeth not shall be damned." The Savior gave the same commission to
the Twelve Apostles anciently, and said, "Go ye into all the world,
and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is
baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned."
But he enjoined another duty upon them, he commanded them to tarry in
Jerusalem until they were endowed with power from on high.
In the chapter I have read, you will notice the Apostle Paul states he
did not receive this Gospel of man, neither was he taught it but by
the revelations of Jesus Christ. From this you see, that the Gospel
was a certain something he could not receive from man, but had to
receive it from Jesus Christ by revelation. The disciples had
traveled with Jesus, they had seen him in the midst of his enemies,
and witnessed that he had been delivered by the power of God from
their grasp; they had seen him cast out devils; they had heard his
voice speak to the dead, and they came forth; thus, they had witnessed
many mighty displays of the power of God through His Son Jesus Christ;
yet, said he, "Before you attempt to preach my Gospel to all the
world, after I leave you and go to the Father, tarry in Jerusalem
until you are endowed with power from on high." They had learned
obedience to his word, and according to the account given of them they
tarried.
The nature of that endowment was different from the one we read of in
these days, viz., to go to college, or other seminary of learning, and
graduate, to be endowed and qualified to preach the Gospel. The nature
of the endowment given to the Apostles anciently was of a peculiar
kind. They tarried till the Jews assembled to celebrate the feast of
Pentecost.
At that feast were assembled the leaders of the Jews, and thousands
flocked to the city of Jerusalem not only from the Jewish nation, but
from the neighboring nations. They waited until the day of Pentecost
was fully come, and while they were assembled together in an upper
room, "suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty
wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting. And there
appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon
each of them. And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began
to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance."
"When this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were
confounded, because every man heard them speak in his own language."
"They were all amazed and marveled, saying one to another, Behold,
are not all these which speak Galileans? And how hear we every man in
our own tongue, wherein we were born?" "Others mocking said, These men
are full of new wine. But Peter, standing up with the eleven, lifted
up his voice, and said to them, Ye men of Judea, and all ye that dwell
at Jerusalem, be this known unto you, and hearken to my words: For
these are not drunken, as ye suppose, seeing it is but the third hour
of the day. But this is that which was spoken by the Prophet Joel,"
&c. Thus, while they were wondering and disputing among themselves,
the chief Apostle Peter, who had received the keys of the kingdom from
his Master, with his brethren, stepped forward and commenced preaching
to them, and gave them a narrative of the dealings of God with
their fathers Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; noticing the promises made to
them, and tracing the subject down through the Prophets to the people
then living.
He told them they had crucified the Lord of glory, that he had risen
from the dead, and being by the right hand of God exalted, and having
received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, had shed forth
that which they saw and heard. "Now when they heard this, they were
pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the
apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do?" The Apostle Peter
having sojourned with the Savior, and witnessed his miracles, if you
please had been with him on the Mount when he was glorified, and being
endowed with the Holy Ghost, the presumption with me is that he
actually was qualified to preach the Gospel as it should be preached.
If we ascertain the Gospel that Peter preached, the Gospel that John
and James preached, the Gospel that the Apostle Paul preached, we
shall ascertain that Gospel, that if any man or an angel from heaven
preach any other the curses of God shall rest upon him. "And they said
unto Peter and the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall
we do?" "Then said Peter unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one
of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye
shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. For the promise is unto you,
and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as
the Lord our God shall call."
In order that you may draw the line of demarcation between the Gospel
preached by Peter on that important day, and the Gospel now preached
in Christendom, I need only call upon you to reflect upon your own
experience, to reflect upon what has been taught you when you have
anxiously inquired what you should do to be saved. How often have you
heard the sound from the pulpit saying, "Come forth to the anxious
bench, to the prayer ring, and we will unite and pray for you, and you
shall be converted;" and sometimes a portion of the congregation is
sent to a private house to pray for you, while the preacher is
operating upon you in public. Again, others that have been taken from
the congregation are waiting at a private house for the priest to
operate upon them there, while the congregation remain to pray for
them in the chapel.
This is practiced extensively among the divines of the present day.
You will find the preachers teaching hell and damnation, and in
various ways seeking to terrify their hearers, by portraying before
them the agonies of the damned, and the miseries to be endured by the
unconverted in the hot lava of hell—the awful condition of the damned
souls that are cast out into the dark regions of Hades; and then they
are praying and working with all their might to convert souls and
turn them to the Lord. I have heard so much of this that I can fairly
taste it yet.
Now I ask you did the Apostle Peter teach anything of this kind—did
he teach the people that they should come forth and be prayed for,
that they might be converted and get the remission of their sins? No:
but in the first place he bore testimony to them, he taught them that
Jesus Christ had been crucified, and was risen from the dead, and that
Jesus Christ is the only name given unto men, by which they can be
saved; that their fathers had persecuted the Prophets, and shed the
blood of the Son of God, and when they anxiously exclaimed, "Men and
brethren, what shall we do?" says Peter, "Repent," &c.
Now upon the subject of repentance; I have been told in my
boyhood that it is a sorrow for sin. There are two kinds of sorrow
spoken of in Scripture: Paul says godly sorrow worketh repentance that
needeth not to be repented of, but says he, "The sorrow of the world
worketh death." The sorrow of the world is of this nature; for
instance, we find men who curse and swear, lie and steal, get drunk,
&c., when they are reproved, or even when they reflect in their
reflective moments, they are sorry for their conduct, but does that
prove they repent? Certainly not, a man may be sorry for sin and not
repent thereof. You may see the drunkard at his home intoxicated,
abusing his wife and children, but when he is sober he is sorry for the
act, and perhaps the next day is found drunk again, he still continues
to pour down the intoxicating firewater, and is sorry again, does he
repent? No; but he is sorry with the sorrow of the world, which
worketh death, which is to sin, and be sorry for it, and go and sin
again; but godly sorrow worketh repentance that needeth not to be
repented of. What kind of sorrow do we understand Peter to mean when
he said to the Jews, "Repent." We understand him to mean, they were to
forsake their sins; to cease to do evil; let him that stole, steal no
more; let him that got drunk, cease the sinful practice; let him who
has been in the habit of doing wrong in any way, cease to do wrong,
and learn to do right.
I am here reminded of a circumstance that took place in Virginia. A
deist, a lawyer by profession, was on his death bed through
consumption; his friends were Presbyterians, and they had prayed for
him again and again, and the poor fellow still remained unconverted,
and of course was expected to go into eternity, to dwell in that hot
place. The last resort was to have a minister to pray for him, but he
still remained unconverted. They exhorted him to repent and turn to
God, and be converted before the brittle thread of life should be
snapped asunder, and he should take his exit to another world. He
thanked them for their advice, and told them he appreciated their
labors. After they had got through exhorting him, he being wearied,
and very sick, they concluded to let him rest, and converse among
themselves on the topics of religion. They began to converse about the
conscience being the most troublesome thing in the world. Said one, "I
am much afflicted with the smitings of conscience when I lie down and
rise up." "And so am I," said another, "that monitor within is
more
trouble to me than anything else here below." When they had got
through, the deist spoke and said, "Gentlemen, you have taken the
trouble to come and give me advice, now permit me to give you a
little; go home all of you, forsake your sins and behave yourselves,
and your consciences will not trouble you any more." It is true
repentance, when a man departs from evil, and cleaves to that which is
good. This is what the Apostle means when he said to the inquiring
Jews on the day of Pentecost, "Repent, and be baptized." "What shall
we be baptized for, Peter?" "For the remission of your sins."
In the first place, you notice, he taught them the Gospel, and faith
sprung up in them by hearing the word of God—the Apostles, filled with
the Holy Ghost, preached the word of God, and the multitude believed.
As soon as they had faith, they were taught to repent; then repentance
is the second step to be taken by the sinner in the Gospel of
salvation. As soon as they were taught to repent, they were commanded
to be baptized for the remission of sins. Some preach the ordinance of
baptism very lightly, they say that baptism is an outward and visible
sign of an inward and invisible grace. I want to reason on
that a few minutes, taking them upon their own grounds.
According to their own admonition, "the faith" means the orthodox
clergy. You know every man considers his religion orthodox, and his
neighbor's religion heterodox. The orthodox clergy of the day, who are
defenders of "the faith," say that baptism is an outward sign of an
inward work. Suppose it is. Suppose I take this woman's child and
sprinkle a little water on its head, that is an acknowledgement or
sign of a corresponding inward work. How much inward work has a
sprinkled person got? Just a little sprinkling, that is all, if
baptism is a sign of the work within.
Now if baptism is an outward sign of an inward work, and you cover a
person in water, that is a sign that the entire man had to be filled
with the Holy Ghost. They reason rightly in relation to their case,
and I presume indeed their mode of baptism is a corresponding sign of
the work within; and immersion must certainly be a very strong sign
corresponding with an extensive inward work, according to their own
reasonings.
But baptism is for the remission of sins. "What!" says one, "baptism
is a saving ordinance!" Certainly it is saving in its nature, in
connection with the balance of the Gospel of salvation. The people are
to be saved if they embrace the Gospel, and to be damned if they do
not. If I escape damnation by obedience to the Gospel, and baptism is
a part of it, I would ask if that is not a portion of the scheme by
which I escape—a part of the scheme by which I am saved? It is
certainly so.
When the angel appeared to Cornelius he did not baptize him, but said
he, "Thy prayers and thine alms are come up for a memorial before God.
And now send men to Joppa, and call for one Simon, whose surname is
Peter: He lodgeth with one Simon a tanner, whose house is by the
seaside: he shall tell thee what thou oughtest to do." Cornelius
obeyed; and when Peter came and learned his situation, and the vision
he had had of an angel, he taught him the Gospel, and commanded him to
be baptized. Peter told him words whereby he should be saved, and
these were a part of them.
It was also said to the Apostle Paul, by the servant of the Lord, "Why
tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins," &c.
That was the way the Almighty had instituted in the Gospel; baptism is
an institution of heaven, sanctioned by the Father, revealed by the
Son, taught by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost; and is the method by
which a man's sins can be remitted. Faith, repentance, and baptism for
the remission of sins were a saving means to the children of men
anciently, and are at the present day, because they are a part of the
Gospel, and are all essential to the remission of sins.
In relation to the mode of baptism, there is sufficient in the Bible
to prove that. The Apostle in writing to his brethren tells them he
was buried with Christ in baptism; and Jesus commanded his disciples
to follow him. If they were buried with Christ, it shows that he was
buried. I ask if you can go and be buried with any of your friends
unless they be buried also? But the world are not pleased with this
mode of remitting sins; they say it is too easy. They make me think of
Naaman the Assyrian, when he came to the old Prophet Elisha; he came
with his gold and his silver, with his chariots and servants,
expecting to be healed of his leprosy by means of some great thing. He
expected by his talents of silver and gold to win the Prophet over to
heal him. Elisha did not even go out to see him, but sent his servant
with a message saying, Go and wash seven times in Jor dan, and be healed. But the old Assyrian was wroth and went away, and said,
"Behold, I thought, He will surely come out to me, and stand, and call
upon the name of the Lord his God, and strike his hand over the place,
and recover the leper. Are not Abana and Pharpar, rivers of Damascus,
better than all the waters of Israel? may I not wash in them, and be
clean? So he turned and went away in a rage." One of his servants
stepped up, and said, "My father, if the prophet had bid thee do some
great thing, wouldest thou not have done it? how much rather then,
when he saith to thee, Wash, and be clean? Then went he down, and
dipped himself seven times in Jordan, according to the saying of the
man of God: and his flesh came again like unto the flesh of a little
child, and he was clean."
It is not that baptism is such a great thing, or that it can be
purchased with silver and gold, that it washes away sins, but because
the Almighty has instituted it as His own ordinance; and if you will
comply therewith, He promises you a remission of sins. If you are
buried with Christ in baptism it proves he was buried.
I once asked a Methodist if he considered Jesus Christ the Lamb of
God. He said he did. I then asked him if he believed that the
Colossians were buried with Christ in baptism, "Yes, but," said he,
"Dr. Clark says, when commenting upon that passage, that immersion was
administered only to adult believers. We believe they were actually
immersed." Said I, "Do you think Jesus Christ was immersed?"
"No, we
think he was either poured or sprinkled." I then inquired of him how
they could be buried with Christ unless he was buried also. He said,
he did not know about that; but he thought it was very probable that
Christ was sprinkled. I asked him if he considered the head of a man
all the man, or if the shoulders and the arms were all the man. "No,"
he answered. "Well, then," said I, "if you consider the head, arms,
shoulders, body, legs, and feet all the man, and the whole man
baptized, you must believe he was immersed to accomplish his baptism."
"If the Colossians were buried with Christ in baptism, he also must
have been buried."
Among other arguments against the immersion of the whole body as the
mode of baptism, he said that delicate women would catch cold if they
were buried in water. I contended, if it would not hurt the Lamb of
God to be baptized it would not hurt a sheep. Then baptism by
immersion is the third principle in the Gospel of salvation; and the
Apostle taught the people if they would be baptized they should
receive the remission of sins, and receive the Holy Ghost; for, said
he, "The promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that
are afar off, even to as many as the Lord our God shall call."
Notice here the extensive promise of Peter, that the Holy Ghost should
come upon every man who would yield obedience to the Gospel. In
process of time, as they preached in the regions round about
Jerusalem, Philip went to Samaria, and preached to the people of that
city; they gave heed to his preaching, and they were baptized, both
men and women. It does not read men, women, and children, but Philip
went to Samaria, and preached the Gospel, and they were baptized, both
men and women; infants are not mentioned; and they had great joy in
that city. Says one, "Yes, they had joy because they had received the
gift of the Holy Ghost;" but wait; when they at Jerusalem heard that
Samaria had received the word, they sent Peter and John to pray for
them at Samaria, and lay their hands on them, that they might receive the Holy Ghost, for as yet it had fallen on none of them;
hence you perceive they had great joy, but not the Holy Ghost. But
when the Apostles prayed for the Samaritans who had received the word,
and laid their hands upon them, they received the Holy Ghost.
Now suppose we should say that the curse of the Apostle Paul would
rest upon every person that did not preach the same Gospel that he and
his brethren preached and practiced, we should only be saying what is
emphatically declared in the Scriptures.
The Holy Ghost was received by the laying on of hands. Was this ever
taught you in England, or in America, except by the Latter-day Saints?
Did you hear this at any protracted meeting of Presbyterians, or at
any meeting of the members of the Church of England? Would you hear
this Gospel in a Methodist Chapel, or on their campgrounds, to repent
and be baptized and receive the Holy Ghost by the laying on of hands?
If you would, you would hear something I never heard. Well, though we
or an angel from heaven preach any other Gospel, let him be accursed.
No matter how near men may preach the Gospel; they must preach the
same Gospel, every part of it, every ordinance of it, every principle
Jesus Christ revealed and his Apostles taught, if they do not, they
teach another Gospel, and if they teach another, says the Apostle, let
them be accursed.
Now if you will preach the same Gospel, you will preach the same
principles precisely that were taught not only by Paul, Peter, James,
and John, but by all the rest of their fellowservants. And when men
received the Holy Ghost, they spake with other tongues, and
prophesied. In order to tell whether people have embraced the true
Gospel or not, we need only to look at their fruits, for by their
fruits shall ye know them, says the Savior. Look, for instance, at the
Corinthian Church; though you read they were guilty of many
absurdities, yet to one was given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to
another the word of knowledge by the same spirit; to another faith by
the same spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same spirit;
to another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another
discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another
the interpretation of tongues. All these gifts, which are reckoned up
and classified by the Apostle Paul, were enjoyed by the Corinthians.
Now some suppose there was a necessity for this display of the power
of God to establish the Gospel, and that when it was established the
gifts would be done away. I recollect reading, in the ninety-fourth
sermon of John Wesley, in commenting upon this subject, he says, "It
has been vulgarly supposed that after the Gospel was established the
spiritual gifts were no longer needed; but this is a gross error. To
be sure we seldom hear of them after that fatal period that
Constantine called himself a Christian. Scarcely an instance of the
manifestation of these spiritual gifts can be found in the second
century, the reason is not that they were done away by the will of the
Almighty, but Christians had apostatized, and become heathen, and had
nothing but a dead form of religion left, and this is the grand reason
the gifts have not continued in the Church." This is the idea Wesley
gives in the sermon I have alluded to, if not the exact language. That
is "Mormonism." In the second century the Church apostatized and
became heathen, and men could not speak by the gift of the Holy Ghost,
and with other tongues, and prophesy, and obtain visions, and the gift
of healing. The Apostle says, If there be any sick among you, let him
send for the Elders of the Church, and the prayer of faith
shall save the sick, &c.
But in the present day it is, "If any be sick among you let him send
for a physician, or a noted practitioner in the healing art; and let
him go forth and administer a portion of calomel mixed with gamboge,
with the addition of a large blister plaster upon the back of the
neck, and you shall be healed." We do not learn this from the
teachings of Jesus Christ, Peter, James, Paul, or any of the Apostles;
it is not incorporated in the Gospel; but the Gospel plan of
administering to the sick is, if any be sick among you, let him call
for the Elders of the Church; and let them pray over him, anointing
him with oil in the name of the Lord; and the prayer of faith shall
save the sick, and the Lord shall raise him up; and if he hath
committed sins they shall be forgiven him. Jesus Christ says, when
speaking of the power that shall attend his servants, "They shall lay
hands on the sick, and they shall recover;" and, says the Apostle Paul,
Stir up the gift of God that is given thee by the laying on of my
hands. It is said that Joshua was full of the Holy Ghost after Moses
had laid his hands on him. Members of the Church of England when they
are sick send for a noted physician, and they trust in a doctor for
their recovery, not in the Lord or in the virtue of their religion.
They dare not, many of them, live in the city without a family
physician; they must have a family physician and an eminent physician,
and in case the family physician fails to prescribe an effectual
remedy they must send for the eminent physician. This is the case with
orthodox professors throughout the world.
Do they preach the Gospel as they did in ancient days? Do they teach
the people to repent and be baptized for the remission of sins? If the
laying on of hands and the anoint ing with oil healed the sick then,
why not now? If the Gospel is the same, if God is the same, if the
Holy Ghost is the same, if faith is the same, if baptism is the same,
and if all the principles of the Gospel are the same, will they not
produce the same effect?
I want to bear my testimony, that mine eyes have seen the sick healed
in the way the Gospel recommends; I have seen the ears of the deaf
opened, and they have heard; I have seen the lame man walk, and leap
like a hart; and I have seen others rise up suddenly from their sick
bed, healed of a consuming fever.
In Montrose, near Nauvoo, hundreds of families were sick nigh unto
death, and some were given up to die. The Prophet Joseph Smith took
some of the Elders with him, and went over there, and said to the
sick, "I command you, in the name of the Lord God, to rise up and
walk." And he went from house to house, and made every man, woman, and
child to walk, and they followed him to the next sick family, and they
are witnesses here to testify to it. There are men now upon the face
of the earth, that by the visions of the Almighty have seen convoy
after convoy of angels. Can you find these things out of the
Latter-day Church? No; you cannot. Are the sick healed in this city?
Yes; I know they are. I have administered to the sick, in company with
my brethren, and they were healed, and I know they were healed by the
power of God; those that die are killed by the doctors. I tell you
their calomel mixed with gamboge, their shaving of the head, and their
blistering operations, kill ten where they heal one.
The Gospel preached by Joseph Smith is the same that is contained in
the New Testament, and which was preached by Jesus Christ and his
Apostles, and it is the power of God to everyone that believes it; it
will heal the sick, open the heavens, and revolutionize the
earth; and this Gospel must be preached to all nations for a witness
to them. I bear testimony to all men that Joseph Smith preached it in
its purity and fulness, as the Apostles of old preached it; and that
it is now being preached in the United States, in Europe, in the
Is lands of the sea, and will be preached in every nation, kindred,
tongue, and people under the whole heavens; and the same fruits, the
same blessings, the same light and glory will be manifested as
anciently.
May God save us all in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.
- Jedediah M. Grant