I have a few words to say to the Latter-day Saints this afternoon, and
if I had time, I have many I could say. I would exhort the Latter-day
Saints to live in peace, to pursue a course that will effectually
preserve the peace that is taught them in the Gospel of the Son of
God, and avoid by every possible and righteous means entering into
contention, quarreling, disputations, lawsuits, &c., &c.
You have heard from brother Geo. A. Smith this afternoon a little of
the history of this Church and people, and the cause of their coming
to these valleys. I am thankful that the rehearsal of those
occurrences has ceased to irritate me as it did formerly. But we are
here, and we wish to enjoy peace; we earnestly desire it, and we
calculate to have it. We are where our enemies cannot come from
Carthage and Warsaw before breakfast, and from Springfield in two
days. We are so far off, and it is so inconvenient to bring this
people to sorrow and affliction in the way it was formerly done, that
they consider another plan necessary to be instituted. I wish to tell
you what it is.
Brother George A. this afternoon has referred to the lawyers. Where
the carcass is there will the eagles be gathered together, and it
seems they think that there is one here to which they are gathering. I
want them to live here; but I want them to plant their own potatoes
and hoe them. It would appear that they think that a civilized
community cannot live long together without contention and consequent
lawsuits. I think that a community is civilized so far as it is free
from contentions, lawsuits and litigation of every kind. We wish our
friends to come here, and participate with us in the good things the
Lord has provided for his people; but we do not want contention. When
I hear men and women say that they will go to a Gentile court to have
their difficulties adjusted, I think they will go to hell unless they
refrain from such a spirit.
The law is made for the lawless and disobedient, not for the good,
wise, just, and virtuous. Law is made for the maintenance of peace, not
for the introduction of litigation and disorder.
What is the true relationship of lawyers to the law and to the
community? They should be the true representatives of peace; it should
be their business to promote it. I am now taking the liberty of
discharging a duty I owe to the lawyers in telling them what their
duty is. They read the law; they do or should understand the law of
the United States, of the States, and of the Territories and cities in
which they live, and whenever they have an opportunity of telling the
people how to live in a way to avoid litigation, it is their duty so to do. Then if they wish to get a living, instead of
picking people's pockets, as is too commonly the case, let them have
their stores, and bring on goods and trade, buy farms and follow the
healthy and honorable professing of farming, and raise their own
provisions, and stock enough for themselves and some to part with, and
when their services are wanted in the law, give it as freely as we do
the Gospel. It is said by lawyers, "We cannot spend our time without
some remuneration." You have no need to spend your time only in some
way to produce means for your subsistence. You can give legal advice
freely, and pursue an honorable and productive business for a living.
Once I had the pleasure of hearing of a lawyer in old Massachusetts,
who attended strictly to his duty. He came into the western part of
Massachusetts and bought him a farm. He was probably as sound a lawyer
as Boston ever produced. They wanted to know why he went to farming
instead of following the profession of the law. He replied, that
according to the present practice a man could not answer the demands
of his clients and be honest. When any of the people would come to him
for advice, if he was ploughing in the field, he would stop his team
and request them to tell him the truth, to state the case as it was,
keeping nothing back on their side of the question. When he had heard
their case he would advise them to settle the affair without going to
law, telling them what was right and just. When they would ask him
what he charged for his advice, he would receive nothing, his team had
been resting while he had been conversing, and he would go to
ploughing again. One lawyer has actually lived in the United States
who did not depend upon the practice of the law for a living, but
followed a legitimate business and gave legal advice freely to all who
asked it. In pursuing this course he did not follow the practice of
picking the pockets of the widow and the fatherless.
We have a few lawyers here, and I know the object of their being here.
I object to their introducing litigation among this people. In some
instances it may be necessary to sue men. We have some men in this
community who are dishonest; they will run into debt, and will not pay
their debts. What shall we do with such men? Shall we sue them? Yes;
if they will not pay their debts and have the means to do so, sue
them; turn them over to the law, which is made for such characters,
but they should first be deprived of the fellowship of the Saints. A
man who will not pay his honest debts is no Latter-day Saint, if he
has the means to pay them. A man who will run into debt, when he has
no prospect of paying it back again, does not understand the
principles that should prevail in a well regulated community, or he is
willfully dishonest. In this country no persons need run into debt to
get bread to feed themselves and their families. There is no need to
go into the second house in this Community to ask for food. Those who
need can obtain food at the first house, in nearly every instance, at
which they will apply. This community feed the poor and the hungry,
and clothe the naked, and they will not let the stranger, or those in
necessity, ask alms without responding to their calls, if it is in
their power to relieve them. Consequently, there is no need of any
person running into debt without a prospect of paying. Men in our
community run into debt to our brethren, and if they are asked for the
pay, they think it is not saint like if they are asked to sell
their stock or put themselves about in the least to pay their just
debts. I have had to contend for, and defend men of business who have
sought to do the community good in transacting business here, from
being imposed upon in this way. But there is no need of further
explanation regarding this; we all understand it; if there are
strangers, or any who belong to the church, who do not understand it,
watch the careers and lives of those who have been long in the church
and who understand true principle, and see whether they pay their
debts or not.
Now, I ask every man and woman who wishes an honorable name in the
Church and kingdom of God upon the earth, if they have entertained any
idea of going to law, to banish it from their minds at once. We have
our Bishop's courts; they can tell us what is right. We have our High
Councils, and we have also our Selectmen here who are sustained by the
suffrages of the people. If you are not satisfied with the decisions
of the Bishop's court and the High Council, call upon the Selectmen,
and let them judge your case. We may be told that it is necessary for
us to have a lawyer to present our case in a legal manner before the
courts; but the less we have to do with this class of professional men
the easier and cheaper will our difficulties be settled. When a lawyer
is going to court with a case, if you ask him, "Do you calculate to be
honest?"
"Certainly."
"Just?"
"Yes, sir."
"Truthful?"
"Most assuredly."
"Do you expect, in presenting a case to the court, to do anything more
than to present the facts in the case?"
"No."
"Where do you get the facts which you present before the judge and
jury?"
"From the witnesses."
"Have you men of common sense on the jury?"
"Yes; the best we can find; they are men of good capacity and capable
of judging right from wrong."
Then what good does it do to reiterate the testimony of witnesses
before the jury? It is an endeavor to make white black and black
white, to make the jury believe that they do not know anything, but
that "I know it all," and "I tell you law," &c. Lawyers will
quote law
that has been obsolete for years before a jury who may not be so well
acquainted with the letter of the law, and this they will do to
endeavor, if possible, to blind the eyes and confuse the minds of the
judge and jury, to make out something that is different from the facts
in the case. Is this the business and duty of a lawyer? It is not. His
duty is to place facts before the court. The jury can hear the
witnesses as well as the lawyer can, the judge can hear the witnesses
as well as the lawyer can, and when the simple facts are told, then
let just men decide.
It should be considered beneath the profession of a lawyer to endeavor
to clear the guilty, and place the innocent in bonds or bring them
into disrepute. I wish to say to that class of gentlemen who are here,
that if they expect to break up this people by lawsuits, I think they
will have a hard time. I will use my influence with every good man,
whether he is in the church or out of it, never to think of going to
law. What comes of litigation? Poverty and degradation to any
community that will en courage it. Will it build cities, open
farms, build railroads, erect telegraph lines and improve a country?
It will not; but it will bring any community to ruin. It draws
hundreds of men within the circle of its influence, who crowd the
courtrooms and spend days and weeks and months of their precious time
for naught, time that should be employed in getting lumber from the
canyons, in building houses and in providing comfortable means of
subsistence for their families. Does it make peaceable, honest, and
industrious citizens? It does not, but it engenders strife and habits
of intemperance and idleness. Instead of crime being lessened by its
influence, it only helps to swell the dark stream.
We have not been broken up, as has been anticipated, by military
force, and now it is expected that a course of lawsuits will
accomplish what the military failed to do. I will say one thing to my
friends, or to my enemies as they may consider themselves (I myself
am not an enemy to any man, yet I am an enemy to some actions), if you
undertake to drive a stake in my garden with an intention to jump my
claim, there will be a fight before you get it; if you come within an
enclosure of mine with any such intent, I will send you home, God
being my helper. You can occupy and build where you please, but let
our claims alone. We have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars in
taking out the waters of our mountain streams, fencing in farms and
improving the country, and we cannot tamely suffer strangers, who have
not spent one day's labor to make these improvements, to wrest our
homesteads out of our hands. There is land enough in the country: go
to and improve it, as we have improved our possessions; build cities,
as we have done, and thus strive to reclaim the country from its wild
state. Is it not a strange thing that men cannot see anything only
what the "Mormons" possess; hence, I swear it, by the Gods of
eternity, if we are obliged to leave this country, we will leave it as
desolate as we found it, and we will hunt those who would compel us to
leave to the last minute. Let us alone, and help us to build up cities
and towns and villages in these mountains, instead of seeking to
destroy the few industrious inhabitants that are here and have made
the country. You cannot destroy this community; it never can be done.
Remember that. And you men and women who think of going to Gentile law
to have your difficulties adjusted, I would advise you to stop it, and
let the lawyers go into other business.
We have plenty of good lawyers who belong to the Church, and there are
more coming. I have some friends coming here, as eminent lawyers as
Massachusetts can produce. I advised them to bring their capital and
so invest it that they could live without depending upon litigation
and the practice of the law. Ever since this Church was first
organized until now we have had to manage and scheme to escape the
toils and snares of our enemies. We have had to ask God for wisdom
that we might know how to wind our way through the difficulties you
have just heard Brother George A. Smith relate. Lawyers will plead law
for the Latter-day Saints as well as for anybody else in the world if
they can get their pay for it. I have seen too much of this for 34
years past. In the days of Joseph Smith lawyers would get together and
hatch out a vexatious lawsuit; one would agree to defend him and
another would agree to plead against him, and this with a view to get
his money. Thousands, and tens of thousands of dollars have been
collected to pay lawyers' fees. "Brother Brigham, how much have
you paid?" Not one farthing. I defied our enemies to get anything
against me wherein I had in any way transgressed the laws of my
country; and if they tried unlawfully, and with a design to put me in
bonds, and to get money from me, they would have to run some risk. We
have had to work and pray in order to get along when we had lawyers
watching us all the time to get something against the leaders of this
people whereby they could in some way bring a lawsuit against them.
Now, they suppose that they have got us safely on polygamy. What about
that? I would say to Congress that if they will pass a law, making it
death for any man to hold illicit intercourse with any woman but his
lawful wife, we would meet them half way on that ground. It is not
uncommon for men who have not been lawfully married to any woman, but
who pass as old bachelors, to have children by several women. A recent
case occurred in Europe which illustrates this point. Prince Christian
of Holstein, who has recently married one of the daughters of
Victoria, Queen of England, has what is termed a morganatic wife in
Germany, by whom he has several children, yet the first lady in
Europe, as Queen Victoria is called, with the knowledge of the fact
that this Prince, who proposed for her daughter's hand, was the father
of several children by a woman, who to all intents and purposes was
his wife, accepts him as a suitable match for her youthful daughter.
The first Court in Europe is not shocked by an alliance of this kind,
no more than is the first society of this country by similar
occurrences in the cities east. Men may do as they please with women,
have numerous children by them, and take as many liberties with them
as if they were their wives, and yet not call them wives, and modern
society smiles upon them. But whenever a man applies the sacred name
of wife to the mother of his children, if he happen to have more than
one, then the world professes to be wonderfully shocked at the idea.
What inconsistency!
Such men will go to hell for ruining innocent women and increasing
illegitimate children in the land. The community or nation that
indulge in such practices will be damned. If I have wives, I take care
of them, and I want my neighbors to let them and my daughters alone.
Do you understand it? If you do not, and should undertake to infringe
upon any of them, I will point my finger at you. Our young men, and we
have many, live virtuous lives with regard to illicit communication
with the sexes; they observe the law which has been given to this
people. Ask the Lamanites if their women ever complained of being
insulted by any of our men at any time, and they cannot produce an
instance. How is it with the outsiders—mountaineers, trappers,
hunters, soldiers, and other men who have been brought in contact with
them. What will the Indians tell you about them? By mingling with
those outsiders the Indians will soon be in the dust. Many of them
have gone there already by mingling with the Gentiles; the seeds of
death have been sown among them, and many of them are dying off; and
they will continue to die through that cause. When our Elders go
abroad to preach the Gospel, or when they remain at home, if they do
not live according to the law of God, we sever them from the Church,
and have no further fellowship with them.
The doctrine of plurality of wives was revealed to this people from
heaven, and if heaven had revealed that we should have no wife at all,
it would have been as faithfully ob served as the present law,
even if it should result in the depopulation of the world, according
to the profession of the Shaking Quakers. But the Lord did not get his
kingdom in that way. The kingdoms he possesses and rules over are his
own progeny. Every man who is faithful and gets a salvation and glory,
and becomes a king of kings and Lord of Lords, or a father of fathers,
it will be by the increase of his own progeny. Our Father and God
rules over his own children. Wherever there is a God in all the
eternities possessing a kingdom and glory and power it is by means of
his own progeny. I am not going to ask the people whether they believe
it or not; and I do not want Brother Heber to do it either, for it is
none of their business. When I tell the truth I do not ask anyone's
testimony to swear to it.
The economy of heaven is to gather in all, and save everybody who can
be saved. Do we wish to destroy people? We do not, not even those
ignorant, bloodthirsty Lamanites. Did we ever destroy? No; it is not
our doctrine; but our doctrine is to build up and save life instead of
destroying it. Is it necessary on any occasion and under any
circumstances whatever? Yes, let a man meet me with a design to kill
me, and I am going to get the first blow if I can. I have not come to
die for the sins of the world as our Savior, Jesus Christ, did. It was
necessary for him to be killed; but it is not necessary for me. It was
not necessary for Joseph Smith to be killed, if the people had
believed his testimony; but as the testator has sealed it with his
blood, his testimony is in force on all the inhabitants of the earth,
and wherever it goes those who reject it will be damned. Our doctrine
is to preach the Gospel of life and salvation, and get every man,
woman, and child to believe and embrace it, and live as near to its
requirements as possible. That is the duty of the Elders of Israel,
and it is our duty to preserve ourselves, our wives and children,
whether we have many or few. Why does not our government make a law to
say how many children a man shall have? They might as well do so as to
make a law to say how many wives a man shall have.
There are a few in the Government who will listen to any testimony
against us, no matter how false. The man who was referred to this
morning has given testimony against us, respecting matters here, which
is utterly false. After making such infamous statements, that man
could not live here twenty-four hours, if it were not that we are
Latter-day Saints who live here. By letting him alone, however, he
will kill himself. There is also a man down the street who tried to
exhibit the endowments to a party who was here. You will see what
becomes of that man. Do not touch him. He has forfeited every right
and title to eternal life; but let him alone, and you will see by and
by what will become of him. His heart will ache, and so will the heart
of every apostate that fights against Zion; they will destroy
themselves. It is a mistaken idea that God destroys people, or that
the Saints wish to destroy them. It is not so. The seeds of sin which
are in them are sufficient to accomplish their destruction. Every
government of the world has the seeds of its own destruction in
itself.
I hope and trust and pray that the government of our country may
remain, because it is so good; but if they cut off this, and cast out
that, and institute another thing, they may destroy all the good it
contains. This, I hope, they will not do; they cannot do it. I expect
to see the day when the Elders of Israel will protect and
sustain civil and religious liberty and every constitutional right
bequeathed to us by our fathers, and spread those rights abroad in
connection with the Gospel for the salvation of all nations. I shall
see this whether I live or die.
May the Lord bless you. Amen.